Page 2 of 2
Re: AB Vigano to be formally charged with schism
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 3:15 pm
by peregrinator
Doom wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:03 pm
peregrinator wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:22 am
Doom wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:56 pm
The evidence recently uncovered proves beyond doubt that Vigano's knowingly made false claims
What were the false claims?
That Francis protected McCarrick Vigano did. He accused Francis of what he himself did. The only charitable way to describe what he has said and done is to suggest that maybe he is so completely senile that he doesn't know what he is saying.
What do you mean "protected"?
Re: AB Vigano to be formally charged with schism
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 5:27 pm
by zeno
Funny how people bring up the abuse scandal in a totally unrelated conversation. No one said anything about sweeping things under the rug, only that the optics are messy and allow people to distort the point to their own ends.
Re: AB Vigano to be formally charged with schism
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:07 pm
by Riverboat
anawim wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:00 am
I wouldn't trust Lifesite as a reliable source. . .
I'm gratified to see someone came to the same conclusion.
On that note, I wish there were a web site with critiques of the Catholic sites out there.