AI Doomerism

[zeno]

I think that (assembly language being specific to the architecture of the computer) was always true.

[Doom]

Yes, but there was one main one BAL which was used for the IBM computers, but now the old IBM architecture is basically extinct, so BAL can no longer be used.

[zeno]

I think we're talking past each other. I am using assembly to refer to a language that resides just above machine code, not a specific iteration thereof. Once you know how to use one variety it's not hard to pick up a new one. That's true of programming in general.

[Highlander]

I know astonishingly little about AI, but I have friend who is deep into it. I was bemoaning the death of cursive writing and the potential loss of a massive swath of history as humans lose the knowledge of how to read it (an other human created fonts). He stated that is was no problem since AIs already can "translate" cursive and any other font into any other font. Thus, no need for cursive.

True?

[Riverboat]

AIs already can "translate" cursive and any other font into any other font. Thus, no need for cursive.

Probably true. But all this means is people are willing to let a machine do its thinking for them. Students used to learn by writing and organizing thoughts on paper. Cursive simply allowed one to do this more efficiently.

Incidentally, you seem to be making up for lost time all at once. I am always gratified to see someone, old-timers and newbies, revive threads and breathe new life into this site.

[Highlander]

Some would replace "new life" with "stale air", but I appreciate the sentiment.

[Jack3]

students using AI to cheat, then yes this is a growing problem.

When I was a student in classrooms (2023ish), this was already a problem. Now it's huge. 90% of random homework that can be done by AI, is done by AI.

[Doom]

I know astonishingly little about AI, but I have friend who is deep into it. I was bemoaning the death of cursive writing and the potential loss of a massive swath of history as humans lose the knowledge of how to read it (an other human created fonts). He stated that is was no problem since AIs already can "translate" cursive and any other font into any other font. Thus, no need for cursive.

True?

It is extremely difficult to write ledgibly in cursive, I've never been able to do it, the only time I have ever written in cursive is when I was required to, and then I got complaints that they couldn't read it, I couldn't help them because I can't read it either and it is not as if I remember everything I wrote.

Even my signature, the only time I ever use cursive, is minimal, I draw a script M with a long tail that takes up the entire line and swoops up at the end. It's the best I can do.

As soon as I was allowed to, I returned to print. Before my carpal tunnel my print was beautiful, immaculate.


I see no point or use for cursive and no one has ever been able to give me a credible reason why I should use it.

[Highlander]

You have convinced me cursive is not for you. For others, however.....

[Jack3]

I know astonishingly little about AI, but I have friend who is deep into it. I was bemoaning the death of cursive writing and the potential loss of a massive swath of history as humans lose the knowledge of how to read it (an other human created fonts). He stated that is was no problem since AIs already can "translate" cursive and any other font into any other font. Thus, no need for cursive.

True?

I suppose it could happen in the future, but the current state of AI isn't usually good enough at doing this without significant error